Child and Adolescent Cultural-Social Research

Child and Adolescent Cultural-Social Research

Digital Youth: Reshaping Adolescence in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Author
mohamad sdid zokaei
Full Professor, Department of Cultural Studies, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran. zokaei@atu.ac.ir
10.22083/cssca.2025.528432.1066
Abstract
Introduction:  This paper argues that digital and network technologies have not merely influenced but have fundamentally reshaped the experience of adolescence in Iran, positioning youth as a decisive force in socio-cultural transformation. Situated within cultural and digital studies, the paper critiques both techno-optimistic and techno-pessimistic discourses and proposes a more nuanced understanding of technology as an embedded component of adolescents’ everyday lives, endowed with both material and moral agency.
Adolescence in Iran is a historically constructed category that emerged alongside urban modernization and the expansion of formal education. The recent proliferation of digital media has profoundly altered this life stage. Iranian adolescents now rely on digital platforms for education, entertainment, communication, and emotional expression. Prevailing interpretations of this shift are polarized: optimistic views emphasize increased autonomy, identity experimentation, and emancipation from traditional social constraints, whereas pessimistic accounts warn of alienation, social fragmentation, and the reproduction of offline inequalities. Rejecting both perspectives as technologically deterministic, the paper argues that digital technologies are deeply woven into the fabric of adolescent life, shaping habits, attitudes, and values, compressing generational structures, and contributing to the democratization of experience.
Method and Conceptual Framework:  Drawing on a cultural studies approach, the study synthesizes existing empirical research-including surveys, and quantitative and qualitative academic studies-to explore how digital cultures are reshaping adolescent identity formation and socialization in Iran.
Findings:  The findings are organized around several key themes. First, the concept of “generation” has undergone transformation. Classical theories define generations through shared historical experiences or collective traumas; however, digital technologies have compressed generational boundaries, increasingly defining them by shared technological objects-such as smartphones-rather than historical events. Iranian adolescents born in the 2000s and 2010s experience social traumas (e.g., sanctions, COVID-19), cultural fragmentation, and a “politics of life,” yet retain local cultural distinctions while negotiating global aspirations. Subcultural analyses reveal clear generational differences in internet use, fashion, and language, demonstrating adolescents’ agency and their “quiet encroachment” into everyday life.
Second, Social Media and Everyday Life are dominated by global platforms such as Instagram and YouTube, despite official filtering measures. Platform use is primarily oriented toward leisure activities, including fashion and music, rather than formal education. Digital platforms also enable civic engagement and subcultural expression, including the organization of protests via Instagram Stories, anonymous accounts for creative expression, and fan activism (e.g., K-pop communities). Blogging and influencer culture (“blaggerism”) further exemplify enhanced agency, though they carry significant risks, such as oversharing personal information, identity misrepresentation, and resulting family or academic conflicts.
Third, Gaming and Virtual Worlds serve as privileged sites for socialization and identity formation for over 30 million Iranian gamers. Contrary to alarmist accounts, games foster creativity, decision-making, and simulations of alternative futures. Emerging 3D and metaverse platforms, along with live streaming on services such as Twitch, facilitate digital-emotional communities and economic exchanges. Additionally, virtual reality (VR) environments and dating applications provide new, albeit potentially risky, avenues for interpersonal relationships, partially compensating for restrictions in the public sphere.
Fourth, the “Affective Turn” reflects the emergence of emotional communities or “affective publics” and “neo-tribes” on social media. These communities are structured around shared subjective judgments and affective experiences. Iranian adolescents’ understanding of intimacy, humor, and social evaluation is increasingly shaped by publicized emotions, the desire for social recognition, “carnivalization,” and the creation of digital heroes and anti-heroes-all amplified within online spaces.
Finally, the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is profound. Algorithms on platforms such as TikTok create echo chambers, shaping self-perception and limiting exposure to alternative viewpoints. AI chatbots offer emotional support but may reduce reliance on human interaction, potentially reinforcing social isolation. AI also exacerbates comparison culture, affecting body image and privacy, while simultaneously offering opportunities for educational innovation and artistic creation. Iranian adolescents navigate these global AI frameworks within a locally embedded religious-ethical context, often accessing filtered platforms through VPNs.
Conclusion:  Digitality has endowed Iranian adolescents with increased agency and new forms of subjectivity rooted in self-expression and digital activism. Traditional institutions have been partially marginalized, prompting a recalibration of symbolic boundaries. The study argues against pathological interpretations of adolescent digital engagement, proposing instead that digital ethics emerge organically from the internal logic of digital spaces. Balanced digital engagement can be fostered through democratic digital literacy, dialogue, and reflective practices, enabling society to understand and support the diverse identities shaped by adolescents in an increasingly digital world.
Keywords
نوجوانی
فرهنگ دیجیتال
نسل دیجیتال
شبکه های اجتماعی
هوش مصنوعی
Subjects
اربابی، اردشیر، کاشانی، مجید و فاطمه مدبری (1402). تأثیر شبکه اجتماعی تلگرام بر تعارضات دینی والدین و فرزندان، مطالعات روان‌شناختی نوجوان و جوان، 4(1)، 157-168.
 https://doi.org/10.22034/scart.2024.139217.1316
اریس، ف (1399). قرون کودکی: تاریخ اجتماعی زندگی خانوادگی، ترجمۀ زینب غنی، کانون پرورش فکری کودکان.
اسکات، جیمز (1396). سلطه و هنر مقاومت: روایت‌های نهانی، ترجمۀ افشین خاکباز، تهران: نشر مرکز.
بادین فکر، محمدجواد (1399). خرده‌فرهنگ‌های دیجیتالی نوجوانان: مورد مطالعاتی هواخواهان ایرانی گروه موسیقی اکسو، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه‌السلام.
بالس، کریستوفر (1380). ذهنیت نسلی، ترجمۀ حسین پاینده، ارغنون، شماره 19، 1-30.
بیات، آصف (1391). سیاست‌های خیابانی: جنبش تهیدستان در ایران، ترجمۀ اسدالله نبوی، تهران: شیرازه.
بیچرانلو، عبدالله و ریحانه اقبالی (1399). بررسی دلایل اقبال نوجوانان و جوانان ایرانی به موسیقی پاپ ایرانی: تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات.
پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات (1399). پیمایش ملی مصرف کالاهای فرهنگی، دفتر طرح‌های ملی.
پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات (1400). پیمایش ملی کودکان و اینترنت در ایران، تهران: دفتر طرح‌های ملی.
تقی‌زادگان، معصومه (1402). کودک و فضای مجازی: تحلیل میانجیگری والدین در استفاده کودکان از اینترنت، فصلنامه علمی مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، 19(72)،201 -228.
  https://doi.org/10.22034/jcsc.2023.547576.2527
جنادله، علی و مریم رهنما (1397). بازنمایی آسیب‌شناسانه رسانه‌های نوین در مطالعات خانواده، مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، 4(16)، 1-40. 
خبره، کبری (1403). شناسایی زمینه‌های به‌کارگیری هوش مصنوعی در آموزش: پژوهش کیفی، رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی، شماره 68، 89-111.
خسروی روزبهانی، بهروز (1403). بررسی کنش‌های عاطفه‌مند استریمرهای بازی‌های ویدئویی و مخاطبان آن در فضای مجازی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
ذکایی، محمد سعید و متین عزیزی (1394). موج کره‌ای در ایران: انگیزه‌ها و آثار اقبال به فرهنگ‌عامه پسند کره‌ای: فضلنامه رسانه‌های نوین، 1(3)، 77-124.                                  https://doi.org/10.22054/cs.2015.4594
ذکایی، محمدسعید و فرزانه نزاکنی (1397). سبک زندگی موبیتال در جامعه دانشجویی، فصلنامه مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، 4 (16)
ذکایی، محمدسعید و سیمین ویسی (1399). زیست مجازی در ایران: عواطف و خرده‌فرهنگ‌ها در شبکه‌های اجتماعی، تهران: آگاه.
رفیع‌زاده، ریحانه و نیکلا لیبراتی (1399). واکاوی نقش آواتار در جهان تخیلی تعاملی بازی‌های ویدئویی، کیمیای هنر، 15، 7-20.
زمانی مقدم، افسانه و نادرقلی قورچیان (1398). بررسی و تعیین عوامل موثر بر مهارت‌های زندگی نسل دیجیتال، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی تربیتی، 14(59)، 105-116. 
زهرانی، داود، هاشمیان‌فر، سیدعلی و احمد مهرشاد (1403). نوجوانان سایبورگ و داده‌های دیجیتال: ردیابی آموزش و درآمد زایی در زیست دیجیتال نوجوانان، جامعه شناسی کاربردی، 35 (4)، 55-82. 
https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2024.142209.2539
سمنانی، بهروز، ذکایی، محمدسعید و سعیده امینی (1403). تحلیل نظام‌مند مطالعات بازی در ایران: رویکردها، مفاهیم و دستاوردها، جامعه‌شناسی فرهنگ و هنر، 7 (1)، 175-198.
https://doi.org/‌10.22034/scart.2024.139217.1316 
عطاری، زهره (1403). گونه‌شناسی هویتی نوجوانان بلاگر ایرانی بر اساس شبکه اجتماعی اینستاگرام، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
مرادی، امین (1403). نقش هوش مصنوعی در گسترش یا تحدید افق‌های معرفتی دانش‌آموزان، تحقیقات راهبردی در تعلیم و آموزش‌وپرورش، شماره 36، 194-179.
ناصری، زهرا و علیرضا نوروزی (1395) تأثیر محیط دیجیتال بر عادت و روش‌های خواندن جوانان، تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه های عمومی، 22 (2)، 213- 227. 
وزارت ورزش و جوانان (1399). پیمایش ملی ارزش‌ها و نگرش‌های جوانان، مرکز مطالعات و پژوهش‌های راهبردی.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. London: Routledge.
Arbabee, Ardshir, Kashani, Majid & Fatemeh Modaberi (2023). The impact of Telegram social network on religious conflicts between parents and children, Psychological Studies of Adolescents and Youths, 4(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.22034/scart.2024.139217.1316 [in Persian]
Aries, F. (2020). Centuries of childhood: Social history and family life. Trans. by Z. Ghani, Tehran: Institute for the Intellectual Development of Children and Adolescents. [in Persian]
Attari, Zohreh (2024). Typology of Iranian adolescent bloggers’ identity based on Instagram. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University. [in Persian]
Badin Fekr, Mohammad Javad (2020). Adolescents’ digital subcultures: A case study of Iranian fans of Exo music group. Master’s thesis, Imam Sadegh University. [in Persian]
Balls, Christopher (2001). Generational mentality. Trans. by H. Payandeh, Arghanoon, No. 19, 1–30. [in Persian]
Bayat, Asef (2012). Street politics: Poor people’s movements in Iran. Trans. by A. Nabavi, Tehran: Shirazeh. [in Persian]
Berlant, L. (2004). Compassion: The culture and politics of an emotion. New York: Routledge.
Bicharanloo, Abdollah & Reyhaneh Eghbali (2020). Exploring the motives behind Iranian youths’ interest in Iranian pop music. Tehran: Center for Culture, Arts and Communication. [in Persian]
Boelstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bolin, G. (2017). Media generations: Experience, identity and mediatized social change. London: Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. London: Routledge.
Buckingham, D. (2008) (ed.). Youth identity and digital media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Center for Culture, Arts and Communication (2020). National survey of cultural goods consumption. Bureau for National Projects. [in Persian]
Center for Culture, Arts and Communication (2021). National survey on children and internet in Iran. Bureau for National Projects. [in Persian]
Couldry, N. & Mejias, U. (2019). The cost of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gennaro, S. & Miller, M. (2021). Introduction: Contemporary children’s culture in digital space(s). In S. Gennaro & B. Miller (eds.), Young people and social media: Contemporary children’s digital culture. Vernon Press.
Gillis, J. R. (2023). Childhood and family time: A changing historical relationship. In A. Jensen & L. Mckee (eds.), Children and changing family: Between transformation and negotiation. London: Routledge.
Hall, B. C. (2019). The disappearance of rituals: A topography of the present. London: Polity Press.
Hall, S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime. New York: Appleton & Company.
Haraway, D. (1985). A cyborg manifesto. Macat International LTD.
Horst, H. & Miller, D. (2013). Digital anthropology. London: Sage.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jenadaleh, Ali & Maryam Rahnama (2018). Pathological representation of new media in family studies. New Media Studies, 4(16), 1–40. [in Persian]
Khabareh, Kobra (2024). Identifying backgrounds affecting employment of AI in education: A qualitative research. Leadership and Educational Management, No. 68, 89–111. [in Persian]
Khosravi Rouzbehani, Behrouz (2024). Exploring affective practices of video game streamers and their audiences in cyberspace. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University. [in Persian]
Lamont, M. & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Maffesoli, M. (1996). The times of our tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276–320). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mead, M. (1972). Culture and commitment: A study of generation gap. London: Partner.
Miller, D. et al. (2016). How the world changed social media. California: UCL Press.
Ministry of Sports and Youth (2020). National survey of youths’ values and attitudes. Center for Strategic Research and Studies. [in Persian]
Naseri, Zahra & Alireza Norouzi (2016). The impact of digital environment on reading habits and methods of youth. Information and Public Libraries Research, 22(2), 213–227. [in Persian]
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rafizadeh, Reyhaneh & Nicola Liberati (2020). Exploring the role of avatar in video games’ fictional interactive lifeworld. Kimiyaye-Honar, 15, 7–20. [in Persian]
Scott, James (2017). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Trans. by A. Khakbaz, Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz. [in Persian]
Semnani, Behrouz, Zokaei, Mohammad Saeed & Saeedeh Amini (2024). A systematic analysis of game studies in Iran: Approaches, concepts and achievements. Sociology of Culture and Art, 7(1), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.22034/scart.2024.139217.1316 [in Persian]
Subramanyam, K. & Smahel, S. (2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. London: Springer.
Taghizadegan, Masoumeh (2023). Children and cyberspace: An analysis of parental mediation in children’s internet use. Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication, 19(72), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.22034/jcsc.2023.547576.2527 [in Persian]
Zamani Moghadam, Afsaneh & Nadergholi Qorchian (2019). Examining factors influencing life skills of the digital generation. Educational Research Quarterly, 14(59), 105–116. [in Persian]
Zahrani, Davood, Hashemianfar, Seyed Ali & Ahmad Mehrshad (2024). Cyborg adolescents and digital data: Tracking education and income generation in adolescents’ digital life. Applied Sociology, 35(4), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2024.142209.2539 [in Persian]
Zokaei, Mohammad Saeed & Matin Azizi (2015). Korean wave in Iran: Motives and consequences of interest in Korean popular culture. Journal of New Media Studies, 1(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.22054/cs.2015.4594 [in Persian]
Zokaei, Mohammad Saeed & Farzaneh Nezakeni (2018). Mobile lifestyle in student society. New Media Studies Quarterly, 4(16). [in Persian]
Zokaei, Mohammad Saeed & Simin Veisi (2020). Virtual life in Iran: Emotions and subcultures in social networks. Tehran: Agah. [in Persian]
The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, New York: Public affairs.